Cases

Client v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Fleet Assessment

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Fleet Assessment.  Our client alleges that Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Fleet Assessment harassed our client, made false allegations that our client stole a rental vehicle, and has discussed the alleged debt with third parties, to name a few types of harassing conduct.

Update: Pending

Client v. Acceptance Now

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Acceptance Now. Our client alleges that Acceptance Now harassed our client and even continued to contact our client after being notified of our representation, among other harmful conduct.

Update: Pending

Client v. Hotels.com

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Hotels.com.  Our client alleges that Hotels.com engaged in false advertisement in its representations of a hotel room client booked through Hotels.com.

Update: Pending

Client v. Sprint

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Sprint.  Our client alleges that Sprint fraudulently charged him for years after cancellation and without any prior notification.

Update: Pending

Client v. Robert Radoff

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of California against Robert Radoff, an individual.  Our client alleges that Robert Radoff was negligent in riding his bicycle when he struck our client.

Update: Pending.

Client v. Sprint Wireless

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Sprint Wireless Our client alleges that Sprint Wireless engaged in harassing debt collection tactics.

Update: Pending

Client v. Debt Collector

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California against a debt collector. Our client alleges that the debt collector engaged in unlawful debt collection conduct, including engaging in house visits over an alleged vehicle debt.

Update: SETTLED.

Client v. Debt Collector

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California against a debt collector. Our client alleges that the debt collector engaged in unlawful debt collection conduct.

Update: SETTLED.

Clients v. Employer

On behalf of our clients, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of California against an employer.  Our clients allege that the employer engaged in intentional misclassification of our clients’ employment status, among other conduct.

Update: Pending.

Client v. Danros LLC

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California against Danros LLC. Our client alleges that Danros LLC engaged in unlawful debt collection conduct, such has house visits, abusive telephone calls to client and client’s references, and numerous threats to client.

Update: Pending.

Client v. NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM LLC

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California against NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM LLC. Our client alleges that NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM LLC engaged in unlawful debt collection conduct.

Update: Pending.

Client v. Automobile Owner

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an automobile owner.  Our client alleges that the auto owner was negligent, resulting in a car accident, one that completely damaged his car and resulting in personal injuries.

Update: Pending

Client v. Bank of America

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Bank of America.  Our client alleges that Bank of America has unlawfully declined our client’s ATM card on several occasions.

Update: Pending

Client v. KEY AUTO RECOVERY; EQUITABLE SERVICES INC.; and SILGAN WHITE CAP CREDIT UNION

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against KEY AUTO RECOVERY; EQUITABLE SERVICES INC.; and SILGAN WHITE CAP CREDIT UNION. Our client alleges that KEY AUTO RECOVERY; EQUITABLE SERVICES INC.; and SILGAN WHITE CAP CREDIT UNION engaged in unlawful repossession tactics when they repossessed our client’s vehicle.

Update: Resolved.

Client v. Automobile Owner

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an automobile owner.  Our client alleges that the auto owner was negligent, resulting in a car accident, one that caused damage to his car and resulted in personal injuries.

Update: Pending

Client v. K & B Engineering

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against K & B Engineering. Our client alleges that K & B Engineering breached its employment contract when it failed to hire our client after our client took steps in reliance of their promises of employment.

Update: Pending.

Client v. Creditor

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California against Creditor. Our client alleges that Creditor engaged in unlawful debt collection conduct.

Update: SETTLED.

Client v. Donald T. Sterling dba Beverly Hills Properties

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Donald T. Sterling dba Beverly Hills Properties. Our client alleges that Donald T. Sterling dba Beverly Hills Properties failed to take action to remove mold from the unit, amongst other conduct.

Update: Pending

Client v. Apartment Complex Owner

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an Apartment Complex Owner. Our client alleges that the Apartment Complex Owner was negligent in keeping a violent dog on the premises, which ended up biting our client.

Update: Resolved

Client v. Automobile Owner

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an automobile owner.  Our client alleges that the auto owner was negligent, resulting in a car accident, one that caused damage to her car and resulted in personal injuries.

Update: Pending

Client v. Chiropractors

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against chiropractors and their clinics. Our client alleges that the Chiropractors unlawfully disclosed our client’s confidential medical records.

Update: Resolved.

Client v. Transcon Financial Inc.

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California against Transcon. Our client alleges that Transcon engaged in unlawful debt collection conduct.

Update: Resolved.

Client v. Telemarketer

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Telemarketer. Our client alleges that Telemarketer has continuously called our client without her prior consent.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Joseph Bella, III, and eCapital, LLC.

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Joseph Bella, III, and eCapital, LLC. Our client alleges that Joseph Bella, III, and eCapital, LLC divulged confidential information to his relatives, among other harmful conduct.

Update: Judgment entered in client’s favor

Client v. Automobile Owner

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an automobile owner.  Our client alleges that the auto owner was negligent, resulting in a car accident, one that caused damage to his car and resulted in personal injuries.

Update: Pending

Client v. Original Creditor

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Original Creditor.  Our client alleges that Original Creditorhas called our client without her prior consent.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. One Main Financial, Inc.

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against One Main Financial, Inc. Our client alleges that One Main Financial, Inc. harassed our client and divulged confidential information to third parties, among other harmful conduct.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Cooper Financial, LLC/Delray Capital, LLC

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Cooper Financial, LLC/Delray Capital, LLC. Our client alleges that Cooper Financial, LLC/Delray Capital, LLC harassed our client, among other harmful conduct.

Update: Pending

Client v. Collection Agency

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a collection agency. Our client alleges that the collection agency harassed our client, called her place of employment, and threatened to show up at her place of employment, among other harmful conduct.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Progressive Management Systems

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Progressive Management Systems. Our client alleges that Progressive Management Systems harassed our client and called our client without his prior express consent, among other harmful conduct.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Dentist

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a dentist and dental office. Our client alleges that dentist and dental office worked on her wrong tooth, causing out client a great deal of pain, suffering, and emotional distress.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Bank

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Bank.  Our client alleges that Bank has continuously called our client without his prior consent.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Yelp and Individual Yelp Reviewer

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute claims against Yelp and individual Yelp reviewer for false, defamatory reviews.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Grocery Market Telemarketer

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California against Grocery Market Telemarketer.  Our client alleges that Grocery Market Telemarketer sent several unsolicited text messages to his cellular telephone.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Eisenburg, Whitman, Associates, LLC

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Eisenburg, Whitman, Associates, LLC.  Our client alleges that Eisenburg, Whitman, Associates, LLC threatened to serve him with a subpoena and claimed that they are a law office.

Update: Pending

Client v. BANK

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Bank.  Our client alleges that Bank has been and continues to report inaccurate information to the credit reporting agencies.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. LCMMC Torrance

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a LCMMC Torrance.  Our client alleges that LCMMC Torrance failed to include specific language as required by law within multiple collection notices.

Update: Pending

Client v. Individual

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an individual.  Our client alleges that the individual has continuously harassed our client and physically assaulted him.

Update: Pending

Client v. Construction Company Telemarketer

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against onstruction company telemarketer.  Our client alleges that onstruction company telemarketer has continuously called our client without his prior consent.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Construction Company Telemarketer

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against construction company telemarketer.  Our client alleges that construction company telemarketer has continuously called our client without his prior consent.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Wells Fargo

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against Wells Fargo.  Our client alleges that Wells Fargo has continuously called our client without his prior consent.

Update: Resolved

Midland Funding LLC v. Client

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to defend our client against Midland Funding LLC for a debt allegedly owed.

Update: Dismissed/Settled

Client v. Phillips, Reinhard & Associates

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a collection agency.  Our client alleges that Phillips, Reinhard & Associates LLC has engaged in excessive illegal conduct.

Update: Pending

Client v. Marauder Corporation

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a collection agency.  Our client alleges that Marauder Corporation has been and continues to report zombie debt.

Update: Pending

Client v. National Credit Adjusters LLC

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a collection agency.  Our client alleges that National Credit Adjusters LLC called her before 8 a.m. on more than one occasion, amongst other harassing conduct.

Update: Pending

Client v. Midland Consulting and Investments LLC

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a collection agency.  Our client alleges that Midland Consulting and Investments LLC claimed to be a law office, threatened our client with suit, and that a Sheriff would get involved.

Update: Pending

People of the State of California v. Client

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to defend an individual accused of burglary and trespassing.

Update: Settled- no felony counts, no jail time

Client v. NCS Collection Agency

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a collection agency, NCS.  Our client alleges that the collection agency has threatened to serve her with a lawsuit, disrupt her place of employment, press criminal charges against her, amongst other harassing conduct.

Update: Pending

People of the State of California v. Client

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to defend an individual accused of burglary.

Update: Settled- no felony counts, no jail time

Client v. Employer

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an employer  Our client alleges that employer sexually harassed her and subjected her to reprehensible conduct, leading to the termination of my client’s employment.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Verifications, Inc.

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a Investigative Consumer Reporting Agency, Verifications, Inc.  Our client alleges that Verifications, Inc. reported criminal record information older than seven years, which resulted in rejection of my client’s prospective employment.

Update: Pending

Client v. Cashcall

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a debt collector, Cashcall.  Our client alleges that Cashcall threatened to garnish my client’s wages, charged interest rates near 100%, called my client continuously, amongst other conduct.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Truck Company

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a trucking company.  Our client alleges that a truck driver from the company caused property damages to my client’s vehicle and personal injuries.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Employer

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an employer  Our client alleges that employer terminated my client in retaliation for complaining about a supervisor

Update: SETTLED

Client v. GTR High Performance

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a mechanic.  Our client alleges that the mechanic failed to repair his automobile, resulting in a car accident, one that completely damaged his car and resulting in personal injuries.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Property Owner

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a property owner.  Our client alleges that the  property owner was negligent in allowing a tree to grow over my client’s property resulting in the tree falling and damaging my client’s automobile.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Neighbors

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against neighbors of my client.  Our client alleges that the neighbors have harassed, assaulted, threatened, and struck my client.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Telephone Provider

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an original creditor, telephone provider.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor charged my client a balance that my client does not owe, placed the account for collections, and reported the account as delinquent on my client’s credit reports.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Employer

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an employer  Our client alleges that employer terminated my client in retaliation for requesting payroll records.

Update: Pending

Client v. Horizon Rent-A-Car

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of California against an original creditor car rental company, Horizon Rent-A-Car.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor threatened to sue my client if payment not received, faxed my client’s invoices to her place of employment, called my client at her place of employment despite the existence of a cease and desist letter, amongst other conduct.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Regent & Associates

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in U.S. District Court, Central District of California, against a collection agency who purports to do business under the name Regent & Associates and uses telephone number (855) 836-7580.  Our client alleges that “Regent & Associates” claimed they are not a collection agency, threatened to file a lawsuit for an alleged debt, threatened criminal charges, disclosed details about the alleged debt with third parties, amongst other harassing behavior/conduct.

Update: Judgment Entered in Favor of Client

Client v. Collection Agency

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against a collection agency.  Our client alleges that the collection agency has attempted to garnish more wages than originally owed and has refused to modify the wage garnishment order.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Telemarketer

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in U.S. District Court, Central District of California, against a telemarketer.  Our client alleges that the Telemarketer called my client several times daily, ignored my client’s requests to be placed on their Do-Not-Call List, and disregarded the fact that my client was registered on the National-Do-Not-Call Registry.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Toledanos

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in U.S. District Court, Central District of California, against a telemarketer, Toledanos.  Our client alleges that Toledanos called my client several times daily, ignored my client’s requests to be placed on their Do-Not-Call List, and disregarded the fact that my client was registered on the National-Do-Not-Call Registry.

Update: Judgment entered in favor of client.

Client v. Telemarketer

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in U.S. District Court, Central District of California, against a Telemarketer.  Our client alleges that the Telemarketer continuously called my client several times daily, ignored my client’s requests to stop calling, and disregarded the fact that my client was registered on the National-Do-Not-Call Registry.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Original Creditor Mortgage Finance Company

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an original creditor mortgage finance company.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor called my client several times per day, left several messages on my client’s and relative’s telephone,  and an employee threatened foreclosure, in addition to other conduct.

Update: Pending

Client v. Original Creditor Automobile Financing Company

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an original creditor.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor called my client several times via auto-dialer, left several pre-recorded messages, an employee disclosed details of my client’s alleged debt to third parties, original creditor ignored cease and desist, amongst other conduct.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Telemarketer Travel Agency

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in U.S. District Court, Central District of California, against a Telemarketer.  Our client alleges that the Telemarketer continuously called my client several times daily and disregarded the fact that my client was registered on the National-Do-Not-Call Registry.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Mortgage Company

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in U.S. District Court, Central District of California, against the Mortgage Company.  Our client alleges that Mortgage Company placed several collection calls to my client despite being informed that my client was represented by counsel, and left several messages on my client’s telephone.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Original Creditor

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an original creditor.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor called my client several times via auto-dialer and left several pre-recorded messages.

Update: Pending

Client v. Original Creditor Furniture Store

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an original creditor.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor called my client several times per day, sent my client several text messages, threatened to sue my client, and refused to cease text messages after being notified to do so.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Corporation

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, against a Corporation.  Our client alleges that the Corporation failed to hire her based on her disability.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Original Creditor Loan Company

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an original creditor.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor threatened to file suit against my client for only being late a few days, in addition to calling from their “Legal Department,” and that if payment was not received shortly, they would file suit.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Original Creditor Furniture Store

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an original creditor.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor called my client several times per day, called my client’s relatives and friends, appeared at my client’s front door on several occasions, in addition to other harassing behavior.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Zeller & Associates

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in U.S. District Court, Central District of California, against Zeller & Associates.  Our client alleges that Zeller & Associates placed collection calls simultaneously to both my client’s cell phone and landline seeking and demanding payment for an alleged consumer debt, called my client by auto-dialer and left pre-recorded messages, claimed to call from the pre-legal department, amongst other conduct.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Collection Agency

On behalf of our client, the Law Office of Eric Sapir filed a Complaint in U.S. District Court, Central District of California, against a collection agency.  Our client alleges that the collection agency placed several collection calls to my client per day and nearly every time my client answered the telephone, a representative from the collection agency would hang up the telephone.

Update: SETTLED

Client v. Original Creditor Furniture Store

The Law Office of Eric Sapir has been retained to prosecute a case against an original creditor.  Our client alleges that the Original Creditor called my client several times per day, sent my client several text messages, threatened to sue my client, and refused to cease text messages after being notified to do so.

Update: SETTLED

 

More cases will be added shortly…

        

Privacy Policy - Disclaimer - Contact Us - Links